Mabey Group Personal Injury Claim and Compensation

Case – Who should pay ? Source - Course Book, Pg 404 Analyzing the case through 8 steps framework. Step 1: Facts of the Problem and Goal to be achieved. Brief description of the case Gene Elliot finds himself in a cobweb of different companies acting as employers, permanent or temporary and working on the same project, directly or indirectly. Having sustained grave injuries at workplace he sues two companies demanding $2.4 mn in settlement. The companies are trying to shrug off the responsibility by referring to different clauses outlined by the law. As the amount is not even contested, goal is to find which organization should be ethically responsible for the compensation payment. In case the best solution is a break up between†¦show more content†¦The base argument is again the same where companies realise their own responsibilities towards the employee and compensate him for negligence and lack of safety systems. The entire discussion of him being a permanent employee for one company and temporary for other is only a way of escaping the possibility of making a payment. This does not reflect strongly on part of the employe r. Alternative 4 - The parent company Mabey Bridge, despite not being sued, could pay Gene Elliot, in part, full or on some other criteria, as he was its permanent employee. This possibility will come into the picture if all other companies somehow are able to stay clear of any payment. The parent company should definitely do something about its valued employee who was sent to a project by the company on basis of his competencies. Thought the company may not seem directly responsible but they were responsible in selecting and approving the contractor and his choice of company for execution of the work. The employee would trust the choice of his company and hence the company is always responsible for its employee. Step 5: Is there a priority emerging or a hierarchy of ethical requirements that call for specific action? Do any of the alternative capture that?. As this is the case of accident during active employment. We found that following are the ethical requirements that should be adhered to 1) Hassle Free procedure. Victim is already suffering from loss ofShow MoreRelatedManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 Pagesis emphasized. This is a fundamentally different situation from what once was the often not very productive intermittent emphasis on these â€Å"intangible† and â€Å"soft† assets by â€Å"fireworks displays† of emphasis primarily on the part of corporate staff groups that have long since been downsized in many companies. THE WAY THE COMPANY WORKS: A NEW COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE Pacesetter companies develop these powers of management by changing the focus of their leadership. In the last several years there has